Personal tools
Stay informed!

Subscribe to Liberty Updates

Get Liberty Updates delivered to your inbox. It's free!

You can help

Support Kansas Liberty

Make Kansas Liberty even better!

Log in

Put your 2 cents in!

Add your comments to these stories and more.

Just log in right here...



Forgot your password?
New user?

Register

 
Document Actions

Kansas Liberty: 09 January 2009

'Huge amounts of money could be saved.' Cutting overlap of city and county services also should be explored, O'Neal says

Speaker urges Legislature to start examining consolidation of school district administrators

Kansas House Speaker Mike O’Neal, a Hutchinson Republican, said with Kansas facing gaping budget holes in the next two years, it’s time for the Legislature to get creative in looking for ways to cut costs.

“The bad news is we’re facing a budget crisis,” O’Neal told Kansas Liberty Friday. “The good news is we have a two-year window of opportunity to look at doing things fundamentally differently. If we don’t have the will to do it now with the budget situation the state is in, then we will have missed a golden opportunity.”

O’Neal said he would like to see lawmakers, when they convene later this month, at least begin discussing two possible initiatives – one that would study the feasibility of consolidating school district administrators and another that would make it easier for cities, counties and other units of government to consolidate services.

O’Neal was quick to point out that he was not advocating consolidation of school districts – that’s a political non-starter. In fact, he says, under his plan, there would be no necessity of re-drawing districts.

“The beauty is there would be no consolidation of school districts,” he said. “There  would be no changes in boundaries, schools wouldn’t close as a result, kids wouldn’t have to travel further to school and team mascots could stay the same.”

What would change is the number of administrators required to manage districts.

“Huge amounts of money could be saved,” O’Neal said. He pointed out that in Reno County, the home of Hutchinson, there are six different school districts, each with superintendents and other administrators drawing robust salaries.

He said he believed that schools in Reno County, or in other Kansas counties, would not suffer diminished performance if some administrative positions and functions were consolidated.

“I can’t put a number on it, but the savings to the state general fund would be significant,” he said. “And, if we reduce the cost of administration, we don’t affect the instructional side. Even the most liberal educator will say that about 65 percent of educational funding goes directly to the classroom. So, if we cut administration, we wouldn’t affect the ability of Johnny and Suzie to learn.”

The idea has been raised before, O’Neal said, but no action has been taken. He cited an administrative reorganization plan authored several years ago by educators, including a teacher in USD 308 located in Hutchinson, who said the number of K-12 administrators in Kansas could be reduced from 300-some to about 40.

“I agree we need good, strong school district leaders to get results, and if you cut too many administrators, you’re cutting into the meat, but you have to wonder if we need the kind of overlap we’re seeing,” he said.

O’Neal said he would challenge the chair of the House Education Committee, Rep. Clay Aurand, a Courtland Republican “to put a proposal on the table this session.”

“We need to at least start to vet these issues,” O’Neal said, in order to get a handle on the type of savings that could be realized.

“We have to start this year at the latest,” O’Neal added. “One way or another, we’ll get the deficit filled in the current fiscal year, but next year, the deficit will be deep and wide and we need to be ready to address that. We can’t wait another year.”

Aurand could not be reached Friday to comment on the possible initiative.

O’Neal said work already had begun on a second initiative – simplifying the process for cities, counties and others governmental units to consolidate services and positions.

- Phil LaCerte

 

The Week in Review

Consolidation Savings...

Posted by Bruce Baker at 2009-01-13 09:51
Consolidating Kansas school districts and other layers of government further is probably a good idea, but the savings are unlikely to be any where near as large as legislators might desire. A few important points:

1. central administrative overhead costs for public schools are relatively small - as a share of public education expenditures. The real long term savings comes not so much from reducing centralized administration (numbers of district units) but from reorganizing individual schools into more optimal operating sizes - where feasible (elementary schools of 300 to 500 students and high schools of 600 to 900 students). But, achieving this optimal long run arrangement often means significant increases in short run capital costs. As such, a well designed consolidation plan likely does not help with the short term budget crunch.

2. When one thinks of consolidating Kansas school districts, one often thinks only of consolidating the smallest of rural school districts, but many of these districts likely can't feasibly be consolidated at the school level. Only the relatively small district level redundancies might be eliminated. One must also look to reorganize smaller districts that are carved out of and clustered near the state's much larger cities and towns (e.g. consolidating Piper with KCK).

As for total savings, the legislature needs to realize that large shares of the state's children already attend scale efficient, reasonably well organized school districts (as a function of the 1963 consolidations) and many of the children who attend very small districts also attend districts that are geographically remote, such that the bulk of operating costs cannot (with present teaching/learning strategies) be cut.

As an aside, the reason that the legislature has the authority to address this issue - forced consolidation - is because of it redrafted the constitution in the 1960s, simultaneously granting itself the authority to force consolidation, while granting itself the responsibility to make suitable provision for finance. Can't have it both ways. Prior to redrafting the state constitution, efforts to consolidate schools had been overturned by the state courts.